On 07/28, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > utrace_do_stop() sets utrace->stopped but leaves the tracee in TASK_STOPPED > > state. This means SIGCONT can wake up the tracee and fool the tracer. > > IMHO this one belongs before 2/4 and 3/4 and all the comments changed to > reflect that SIGKILL is the only case. But the incremental order really > doesn't matter for the utrace part, we will just merge these all and > eventually generate fresh utrace patches from scratch for upstream > submission, not incremental ones.
Yes, agreed. OK, I'll send the first patch upstream, then I re-send 2-4 with updated comments to you. Oleg.
