On 07/28, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll send the first patch upstream, then I re-send 2-4 with updated
> > comments to you.
>
> Ok, good.  When I get those I'll merge those upstream-bound ones into the
> tracehook git branch (now just signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch)
> and merge the utrace changes into the utrace branch.

Since we are going to send some tracehook changes upstream, how about the
patch below as well?

I think it is very unlikely we will need death_cookie in the near future,
and it is always nice to simplify the code.

Oleg.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[PATCH] tracehooks: remove death_cookie from exit_notify() path

Remove "void *death_cookie" from exit_notify() pathes, it is not really
used.


--- __UTRACE/include/linux/utrace.h~KILL_COOKIE 2009-07-28 23:27:14.000000000 
+0200
+++ __UTRACE/include/linux/utrace.h     2009-07-29 02:05:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void utrace_finish_vfork(struct task_str
        __attribute__((weak));
 void utrace_report_exit(long *exit_code)
        __attribute__((weak));
-void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *, struct utrace *, bool, int)
+void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *, bool, int)
        __attribute__((weak));
 void utrace_report_jctl(int notify, int type)
        __attribute__((weak));
--- __UTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h~KILL_COOKIE      2009-07-28 
23:28:47.000000000 +0200
+++ __UTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h  2009-07-29 02:04:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ static inline void tracehook_finish_jctl
 /**
  * tracehook_notify_death - task is dead, ready to notify parent
  * @task:              @current task now exiting
- * @death_cookie:      value to pass to tracehook_report_death()
  * @group_dead:                nonzero if this was the last thread in the 
group to die
  *
  * A return value >= 0 means call do_notify_parent() with that signal
@@ -550,10 +549,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_finish_jctl
  * Called with write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) held.
  */
 static inline int tracehook_notify_death(struct task_struct *task,
-                                        void **death_cookie, int group_dead)
+                                               int group_dead)
 {
-       *death_cookie = task_utrace_struct(task);
-
        if (task_detached(task))
                return task->ptrace ? SIGCHLD : DEATH_REAP;
 
@@ -572,14 +569,12 @@ static inline int tracehook_notify_death
  * tracehook_report_death - task is dead and ready to be reaped
  * @task:              @current task now exiting
  * @signal:            return value from tracheook_notify_death()
- * @death_cookie:      value passed back from tracehook_notify_death()
  * @group_dead:                nonzero if this was the last thread in the 
group to die
  *
  * Thread has just become a zombie or is about to self-reap.  If positive,
  * @signal is the signal number just sent to the parent (usually %SIGCHLD).
  * If @signal is %DEATH_REAP, this thread will self-reap.  If @signal is
  * %DEATH_DELAYED_GROUP_LEADER, this is a delayed_group_leader() zombie.
- * The @death_cookie was passed back by tracehook_notify_death().
  *
  * If normal reaping is not inhibited, @task->exit_state might be changing
  * in parallel.
@@ -587,8 +582,7 @@ static inline int tracehook_notify_death
  * Called without locks.
  */
 static inline void tracehook_report_death(struct task_struct *task,
-                                         int signal, void *death_cookie,
-                                         int group_dead)
+                                         int signal, int group_dead)
 {
        /*
         * This barrier ensures that our caller's setting of
@@ -603,7 +597,7 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_deat
         */
        smp_mb();
        if (task_utrace_flags(task) & _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS)
-               utrace_report_death(task, death_cookie, group_dead, signal);
+               utrace_report_death(task, group_dead, signal);
 }
 
 #ifdef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
--- __UTRACE/kernel/exit.c~KILL_COOKIE  2009-07-13 17:44:27.000000000 +0200
+++ __UTRACE/kernel/exit.c      2009-07-29 02:02:47.000000000 +0200
@@ -803,7 +803,6 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
 static void exit_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, int group_dead)
 {
        int signal;
-       void *cookie;
 
        /*
         * This does two things:
@@ -839,7 +838,7 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_stru
             tsk->self_exec_id != tsk->parent_exec_id))
                tsk->exit_signal = SIGCHLD;
 
-       signal = tracehook_notify_death(tsk, &cookie, group_dead);
+       signal = tracehook_notify_death(tsk, group_dead);
        if (signal >= 0)
                signal = do_notify_parent(tsk, signal);
 
@@ -853,7 +852,7 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_stru
 
        write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
-       tracehook_report_death(tsk, signal, cookie, group_dead);
+       tracehook_report_death(tsk, signal, group_dead);
 
        /* If the process is dead, release it - nobody will wait for it */
        if (signal == DEATH_REAP)
--- __UTRACE/kernel/utrace.c~KILL_COOKIE        2009-07-29 00:14:42.000000000 
+0200
+++ __UTRACE/kernel/utrace.c    2009-07-29 02:06:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -1659,9 +1659,9 @@ void utrace_report_exit(long *exit_code)
  * For this reason, utrace_release_task checks for the event bits that get
  * us here, and delays its cleanup for us to do.
  */
-void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace,
-                        bool group_dead, int signal)
+void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *task, bool group_dead, int signal)
 {
+       struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task);
        INIT_REPORT(report);
 
        BUG_ON(!task->exit_state);

Reply via email to