On 08/14, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I've merged those onto the utrace-ptrace branch. We can proceed however > you'd like. But I'm not sure how much sense it makes to do it all by > incremental change on the old utrace-ptrace branch. The way you're going, > we'll have a new big utrace-ptrace.patch in the end.
Yep. And I agree, this is not good. > But I don't think > that's what we'll need to submit upstream. > > In the end, what I expect we'll want is the ptrace-on-utrace work, and > perhaps the utrace core itself too, split into smaller incremental pieces The only problem, right now I can't imagine how to make the smaller incremental (and bisectable) changes. And more, I can't imagine how the code will look after rework. _Perhaps_, when the code will be ready, I will be able to split the changes. OK. As always, I did much less than expected. I am sending 07-09 trivial patches now. I need to think a bit before further changes. (I did a bit more change in fact, but then reverted them all and started from the beginning). Oleg.
