On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 11:13, David Smith wrote:
> Having used both, here are some of the advantages/disadvantages of each.
> Debian
> 
> Advantages
>   Sleak package management
>     Pakackages play very nicely together. I've rarely had a problem.

I've actually had quite a few problems with deb packages.  Sometimes
they'll go in but won't configure.  Then you can't remove them until you
figure out why one of the post-install or pre-removal or whatever script
broke.

I found out that the majority of my problems were caused by a buggy
"scrollkeeper" package on sparc.  (The bug is sparc specific.)  

So the debian packaage system isn't a pancea.  Basically I find almost
no advantages of debian packages over RPM now that apt-get supports
rpms.

>   Security
>     The Debian security team does a great job keeping updates current.
>   Updates are fast -- no compiling
>   Support
>     irc.debian.org: 24x7 support. Good stuff.

Not only that, but debian provides a consistant distro for every
platform Linux runs on.  That's one very nice thing.

> 
> Disadvantages
>   The Stable tree is oooold. Are they still using a 2.2 kernel?
>   To get anything worth using, you must run the testing branch
>   Does a lot of default config that I don't like.

I installed Debian 3.0 stable on my ultrasparc and it's a nice 2.4.18
kernel.  I think that's standard for stable now.

Personally I find debian to be good, but extremely rough and crude
around the edges, particularly in the init scripts.  I also dislike how
debian runs the X server and login manager at runlevel 2.  I prefer the
redhat runlevels which are more logically split up.  I would just hack
things on the debian box to work better, but messing with the init
scripts and how X runs breaks how the deb packages configure things when
they install.  In short, debian will never be my desktop distro.  Server
and non-x86 archs definitely benefit from debian, though.

Michael


> 
> --Dave
> 
> 
> <quote who="Mark Gulbrandsen">
> > Not to start a flame war or anything (seriously)....but....
> >
> > Is debian better than gentoo? Is gentoo better than debian? Why or why
> > not? I haven't used debian much, but I can't ever go back to red hat or
> > mandrake or suse after having used gentoo. Portage makes life so much
> > easier. But I've heard people rave about apt-get.
> >
> > So, what does everyone think? Why one over the other?
> >
> > Does apt-get compile from source with custom arch settings?
> >
> > Are there a billion apps available with apt-get like with emerge
> > (strictly speaking, portage)?
> >
> > How about release cycles? Gentoo always seems to keep up with the latest
> > and greatest userland apps.
> >
> > Also, gentoo has every package configured very nicely and in context of
> > their system layout. How about debian?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > --
> > If the future's looking dark
> > We're the ones who have to shine
> > If there's no one in control
> > We're the ones who draw the line
> > Though we live in trying times
> > We're the ones who have to try
> > Though we know that time has wings
> > We're the ones who have to fly!
> >
> > No matter what they say
> > No matter what they say
> >
> >     -Rush, Counterparts, Everyday Glory
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> > BYU Unix Users Group
> > http://uug.byu.edu/
> > ___________________________________________________________________ List
> > Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________
> BYU Unix Users Group 
> http://uug.byu.edu/
> ___________________________________________________________________
> List Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to