On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 16:20, Stuart Jansen wrote: > Michael correctly parsed and evaluated the expression the first time. I > spent 6.25 lines describing a transparent desktop and its use for a > reason. I realize that English isn't an unambiguous grammar, but do you > really think I'd be asking if remote X connections are possible?
I thought I had it right, but Bob's response confused me. I'm easily confused. Does it not work for him with KDE? In theory, Hummingbird should be configurable to ignore the root window and show the win32 desktop though. Anyway, I really don't know how to do it, but I know it is possible. Michael > > BTW, he prefers KDE so it's not Nautilus displaying the desktop. I'm > sure that if he can get just Kicker (or whatever it's called now), he > can live without the icons. -- Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://phantom.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
