On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:04:35PM -0600, Michael Torrie wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 17:59, Michael Torrie wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 19:58, Michael Halcrow wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:39:04PM -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote: > > > > Anyway, what's next, debian for windows? :) Why not. > > > > > > Or how about Windows for Debian? Or MacOS for Windows? Or OS/2 for > > > HP-UX? > > > > > > > Hmm, but I don't think you got my point. > > Further to that, debian is already pretty OS agnostic and really just a > way of packing things. So far debian already runs on two different > kernels, linux and NetBSD.
http://www.debian.org/intro/about -- ------------------------------------------- | --------------------- Michael Halcrow | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developer, IBM Linux Technology Center | | I am in total control, but don't tell my | wife. | ------------------------------------------- | --------------------- GnuPG Keyprint: 05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D 2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
