On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:41:26AM -0700, Stuart Jansen wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:27, Michael Halcrow wrote: > > I tried with 2.6.0-test a while back. The patch I found didn't apply > > cleanly, and after a little hacking, it wouldn't compile (one of the > > first .c files in the build process). I just left it alone in > > anticipation for the 2.6.0 (non-test) release. > > > > I'd like to know if you do manage to get it working, and if so, how > > you did it. > > Wasn't UML rolled into the 2.6 kernel so that you didn't need to patch > to get it?
Er... not that I could tell. At least not with the kernel source that
I got. I had to apply a patch in order to get a UML option in the
config menu. But perhaps there is a UML build target now, or
something to that extent... I honestly haven't looked that close at
the more recent kernel releases yet.
Mike
.___________________________________________________________________.
Michael A. Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Security Software Engineer, IBM Linux Technology Center
GnuPG Fingerprint: 05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D 2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities."
- Voltaire
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
