And here's this one... My point was that SUVs have way more power and functionality than you'd ever use between your home and the grocery store or the soccer field.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bryan Murdock wrote: > I would buy this if the supposed economy car of Windows was cheaper and > Linux was spilling more toxic fumes into the atmosphere, but I'm afraid > that isn't true. Hmm, in fact it's quite the opposite in both cases > (ok, maybe windows doesn't really produce toxic fumes). I don't > understand these "it's too bloated" arguments against any software. So > what? What's the trade off? Software doesn't produce any toxic waste, > noxious gasses, or anything like that. Greenpeace isn't going to knock > at your door because of a large memory footprint, or unused features. > What's the big deal? I guess that's why I'm an emacs lover when others > aren't. > > Bryan ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
