On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:30:40PM -0700, Stuart Jansen wrote: > > Hey, I want a button! Er.. yeah.. or something. > > I wonder when they added that. > > Anyway, sorry everyone, at this point I'm going to have to change camps. > If you don't use an MUA with a reply to list feature you're behind the > times and will have to suffer. ;-) >
Speaking of reply to list, at least in Mutt you have to specify the list in your config file in order to be able to use it (otherwise it can't tell what part of the address is the list that you're trying to reply to). In my opinion, reply-to is just a hint to your MUA to clarify what address is the list address. Everybody who's talking about how mail programs should have a reply-to-list feature also need to realize that all programs should also have the ability to choose between replying to the "from" address or the "reply-to" address. In Mutt, you can tell it which one you generally want to do. I think that lists should definitely put in a reply-to line. It's not munging, because it's only adding a line--not changing any. And it's just a hint that you can choose whether or not to ignore. -- Andrew McNabb http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
