On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:06:41PM -0600, Von Fugal wrote: > I too noticed a change because it borked my mutt ListReply. The change[1] > was the reply-to header that mailman puts in. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I doubt the reply-to header is what caused the berzerk authentication but > I bet the new To: headers as a result of the new reply-to: did. >
First, how are you setting up mutt to deal with mailing lists? I didn't have any problems with the header changes, my ListReply (default 'L') continued to work without a hitch. I'm curious to see how you've got mutt configured for mailing-lists is such a small[1] change broke it. > > [1]Who do these people think they are, just going around changing headers > willy-nilly like that? Down with the MS/SCO++[2] regime! > > [2] AKA, the Mcnabb Super-user/SCOtt regime There is no such regime. It's all in your imagination. Move along. [1] Small is a relative term based on how much this did actually affect you. -- Scott Paul Robertson http://spr.mahonri5.net GnuPG FingerPrint: 09ab 64b5 edc0 903e 93ce edb9 3bcc f8fb dc5d 7601
pgpHbHYqejqkE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
