* Scott Paul Robertson [Wed,  7 Jul 2004 at 19:45 -0600]
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:06:41PM -0600, Von Fugal wrote:
> > I too noticed a change because it borked my mutt ListReply. The change[1]
> > was the reply-to header that mailman puts in.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I doubt the reply-to header is what caused the berzerk authentication but
> > I bet the new To: headers as a result of the new reply-to: did.
> > 
> 
> First, how are you setting up mutt to deal with mailing lists? I didn't
> have any problems with the header changes, my ListReply (default 'L')
> continued to work without a hitch. I'm curious to see how you've got
> mutt configured for mailing-lists is such a small[1] change broke it.

I don't know if this is normal behaviour, but my mutt wouldn't list-reply
without an address entry in the ~/.mutt/lists.muttrc file ('no mailing list
found!' without it). Maybe just by virtue of there being said file it acts
somewhat like an 'allow' file. Anyway, I just added the new address to the
file and all is fine, and I will continue in subserviance to the regime, at
least for the meantime.

Von Fugal

Attachment: pgpDakz4NZ6PL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to