On Fri 14 Jan 2005 at 01:00:03, Andrew McNabb said: > Like I said, it's still a draft. If you could take a minute to glance > through it and give suggestions for changes, I'd really appreciate it.
How do you intend to do put together the network? Are you going to force everyone to be behind some sort of NAT router doing its own DHCP? I think this is the best idea. But if so, then don't use the 10.X netblock because that's what campus is already using, and you'd be bound to have some sorts of problems with the routers in the CTB if you did. Use some part of the 172.16 netblock because AFAIK nothing (widely-routable, that is) on campus uses it. I want my IPv6. -- Soren Harward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "It's not so much verbing that weirds language, as much as it is the renounification." -- Marc LeBlanc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
