On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:43:48PM -0700, Scott Paul Robertson wrote: > > The first offense will result in a private warning to the individual. If > the individual persists, and a second offense occurs within a reasonable > time period, that person will be removed from the list.
1. I liked the idea from jb's policy where particularly egregious offences don't get the honor of a first warning (Michael's wouldn't fall under the category of egregious offenses). 2. I would also add a line that decisions are made by the secretary (mailing list admin) in correspondence with the president and vice-president. Appeals are made to the faculty sponsor, who is the final authority on the matter. 3. I'm still undecided on public announcements. My current tentative feeling is that warnings are private but bans are announced publically. -- Andrew McNabb http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
pgpl1zNtVs6C1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
