On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:26 -0700, Steve Meyers wrote: > Stuart Jansen wrote: > > A simple "dude, that isn't cool around here" and a link to the policy > > (I still prefer an inline copy with the specific requirement in the > > policy that it be copied inline) is hardly a public flogging. > > That's a good point. However, I think it would be better to give a > public "dude, that's not cool" as well as a private, more formal > warning. Someone might not realize that "dude, that's not cool" isn't > an official warning. I wouldn't want to see someone caught off guard by > a banishment when they didn't realize they had been warned in the first > place.
I think we have a compromise with the best of both approaches! So who's going to roll the next iteration of the policy with this and the appeals process included? -- Stuart Jansen e-mail/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "XML is like violence: if it doesn't solve your problem, you aren't using enough of it." - Chris Maden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
