> That would be an interesting poll. Chime in if you've ever installed apt on > fedora or another distro that didn't have it natively (like ubuntu does). > I'm interested in finding out how popular the said prospect is. You also > need to have run it for longer than 2 weeks. It doesn't count if you did it > to see if it was possible and then whiped it a few days later.
I used apt-get extensively on OSX (via. the Fink project). I used "ports" (BSD ports for OSX) for some time, and emerge for a while...probably 2-4 weeks. > I once THOUGHT about it...but then I just threw my fedora out the window and > went with debian... It seems like an entire waste of time to change one of > the main things that, in my opinion, _defines_ a particular distro rather > than use what the distro supplies. It's like taking a particular distro and > making the Moore-distro or the Brian-distro, it's just too much of a change. I thought apt for rpm was pretty supported...not really a Fedora user though. -- Michael Moore ------------------------------- www.stuporglue.org -- Donate your used computer to a student that needs it. -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
