I seem to share the same opinion as Andrew. One example that might
illustrate this a bit more effectively:

We do not know with surety what these people are monitering. It would
not be out of the question for them to be monitering emails that sound
suspiciously like an honor code violation. They can then forward these
people that have committed this honor code violation to the honor code
office with a copy of the email they said.

Now, suppose that I'm a bishop of a BYU ward. Suppose I'm helping a
student in my ward through an offense that normally would be an honor
code violation. He or she has given me total confidentiality of this
matter. I have agreed not to share this matter with anyone else as a
service to the student. We communicate about his or her offense
through email and I maybe even make suggestions of things he or she
can do through email to improve his or her life.

Because BYU is monitering suspicious emails of what seems like honor
code violations, they moniter my communications with this student. If
the person monitering the email was an associate of my student's,
trust is now broken and relationships could be strained.

I personally would not like my communications monitered. I have A LOT
of confidential information in my email that I would not share with
the general public. Anyone who says otherwise, I'll gladly accept your
password to your email. :)

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Andrew McNabb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:33:57AM -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> Michael Torrie wrote:
>> > I do my own certificates signed by my own certificate authority.  That
>> > way I can just have someone download my ca certificate and load it into
>> > their system and then everything I do is validated for them.
>>
>> I use a neat little gui called xca to do my certificate management.
>>
>> http://xca.sf.net
>>
>> It's in the repositories of many distros already.
>
> Thanks for the tips.  I need to look into this.  I've done openssl on
> the command-line before, but this just isn't pleasant.
>
> --
> Andrew McNabb
> http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
> PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
> --------------------
> BYU Unix Users Group
> http://uug.byu.edu/
>
> The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
> author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
> ___________________________________________________________________
> List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
>
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to