Emacs.  Beware of the great and abominable church of Vim, for they are
led astray by separate modes of editing and strange commands.  They
clearly know not what they do.

2010/4/19 Aaron Toponce <[email protected]>:
> On 4/19/2010 9:02 PM, Matthew Gardner wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Daniel Dilts <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     It is also a great place to cause Vim vs. Emacs flamewars.
>>
>>
>> Maybe we should settle this with a vote (or is it a survey?):
>>
>> Vim: 3 (Matt, Garrett, AJ)
>> Emacs: 0
>>
>> May the best editor win!  (which of course is vim)
>
> Speaking of which, you may or may not be aware, but Vim might, just
> might, integrate Python as its language for Vim scripts, rather than
> extending the Vim scripting language.
>
> http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
>
> --
> . O .   O . O   . . O   O . .   . O .
> . . O   . O O   O . O   . O O   . . O
> O O O   . O .   . O O   O O .   O O O
>
>
> --------------------
> BYU Unix Users Group
> http://uug.byu.edu/
>
> The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
> author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
> ___________________________________________________________________
> List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
>


-- 
Dallin Terry
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to