On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 10:14 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:49:03PM -0600, Matthew Gardner wrote: > > Well, I fixed the vim problem. It turned out that the Fedora 12 version was > > something like 2.7.3, and the Fedora 14 version was 2.7.2, for some reason. > > So, because the version number was lower, the package didn't update and was > > left in a broken state. Updating after the official launch of Fedora 14 > > didn't help, again because of the version number. But removing the old > > package and reinstalling it worked just fine. > > Weird. I think you should open a Fedora bug on this (at > bugzilla.redhat.com).
Nah, it's not that unusual. One the side effect of Fedora being a weird hybrid somewhere between rolling releases and stable releases. -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
