Hi folks, Floyd|Snider, Inc. is seeking a GIS/Database professional with ~5 years experience. We are a women-owned environmental and engineering firm located in Seattle. For more information please visit the job posting on our website: http://www.floydsnider.com/contact.php
Cheers, Chris ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected] u] On Behalf Of Robert A. Norheim [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 10:08 PM To: UW - GIS Discussion and Support Subject: Re: [UW-GIS-L] difficulty using raster boundary clean But make sure that the raster you use to Snap to is not open in ArcMap. There is a bug in Arc 10 that makes snap to raster not work unless you run it from ArcCatalog or, if in ArcMap, not have the raster open in the map. --Rob Robert A. Norheim GIS Analyst College of the Environment University of Washington 3737 Brooklyn Ave. NE, Box 355672 Seattle, WA 98195-5672 206 616-6865 [email protected] http://staff.washington.edu/norheim/ Multiple affiliations at UW College of the Environment: * Climate Impacts Group (JISAO) * Fire & Mountain Ecology Lab (School of Forest Resources) * Fire & Environmental Applications Team (USDA Forest Service PNW Station) "Time spent climbing mountains will not be deducted from your life" On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Phil Hurvitz wrote: > There should be a "snap to raster" parameter somewhere. Set that to your > input raster and the registration should OK. > > -P. > > ************************************************************** > Philip M. Hurvitz, PhD > Urban Form Lab | 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 | Box 354802 > University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-4802, USA > [email protected] | http://gis.washington.edu/phurvitz > "What is essential is invisible to the eye." -de Saint-Exupéry > ************************************************************** > > On 2/11/2011 5:26 PM, Danelle Heatwole wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm trying to run the boundary clean tool on a reclassified DEM, and the >> result I get is shifted north of the original by 125 m or more. Changing >> options in the tool itself doesn't seem to make a difference. Has anyone >> else run into this and found a solution? >> Thanks, >> Danelle >> >> -- >> Danelle Heatwole >> Research Scientist >> Wetland Ecosystem Team >> School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences >> University of Washington >> 1122 NE Boat St / Box 355020 >> Seattle, WA 98195-5020 >> (206) 221-6885 >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Uw-gis-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/uw-gis-l > _______________________________________________ > Uw-gis-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/uw-gis-l > _______________________________________________ Uw-gis-l mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/uw-gis-l
