Can the -DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES=1 part of

  'CCFLAGS':      ['-m32', '-DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES=1'],

go into a CPPDEFINS like this

  'CPPDEFINES':   ['CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES']

instead?

Also regarding the comments and the flags to the Android build, why does it
need to be set to 1, isn't it enough to just define it like

  -DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES

Also should we have a --enable-unaligned-access
(and --noenable-unaligned-access)?

/Søren

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 20:49, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Revision: 4604
> Author: [email protected]
> Date: Thu May  6 05:49:12 2010
> Log: Allow unaligned memory accesses on ARM targets that support it.
> The build process must add -DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES=1 to the
> C++ flags to activate the support.  This is a commit for
> Subrato of CodeAurora.  See http://codereview.chromium.org/1731013
> Small edits by Erik Corry to activate unaligned accesses by
> default on the simulator and testing Android builds.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4604
>
> Modified:
>  /branches/bleeding_edge/SConstruct
>  /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/constants-arm.h
>  /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/regexp-macro-assembler-arm.cc
>  /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/simulator-arm.cc
>  /branches/bleeding_edge/src/globals.h
>
> =======================================
> --- /branches/bleeding_edge/SConstruct  Mon Apr 19 12:30:11 2010
> +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/SConstruct  Thu May  6 05:49:12 2010
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
>                  '-finline-limit=64',
>                  '-DCAN_USE_VFP_INSTRUCTIONS=1',
>                  '-DCAN_USE_ARMV7_INSTRUCTIONS=1',
> +                 '-DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES=1',
>                  '-MD']
>
>  ANDROID_INCLUDES = [ANDROID_TOP + '/bionic/libc/arch-arm/include',
> @@ -203,7 +204,7 @@
>       'CPPDEFINES':   ['V8_TARGET_ARCH_ARM']
>     },
>     'simulator:arm': {
> -      'CCFLAGS':      ['-m32'],
> +      'CCFLAGS':      ['-m32', '-DCAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES=1'],
>       'LINKFLAGS':    ['-m32']
>     },
>     'armvariant:thumb2': {
> =======================================
> --- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/constants-arm.h     Thu Apr  8 06:30:48
> 2010
> +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/constants-arm.h     Thu May  6 05:49:12
> 2010
> @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
>  # define CAN_USE_THUMB_INSTRUCTIONS 1
>  #endif
>
> +#if CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES
> +#define V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED 1
> +#endif
> +
>  // Using blx may yield better code, so use it when required or when
> available
>  #if defined(USE_THUMB_INTERWORK) || defined(CAN_USE_ARMV5_INSTRUCTIONS)
>  #define USE_BLX 1
> =======================================
> --- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/regexp-macro-assembler-arm.cc       Mon
> Apr 19 12:30:11 2010
> +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/regexp-macro-assembler-arm.cc       Thu
> May  6 05:49:12 2010
> @@ -1210,14 +1210,31 @@
>     __ add(r0, current_input_offset(), Operand(cp_offset * char_size()));
>     offset = r0;
>   }
> -  // We assume that we cannot do unaligned loads on ARM, so this function
> -  // must only be used to load a single character at a time.
> +  // The ldr, str, ldrh, strh instructions can do unaligned accesses, if
> the CPU
> +  // and the operating system running on the target allow it.
> +  // If unaligned load/stores are not supported then this function must
> only
> +  // be used to load a single character at a time.
> +#if !V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
>   ASSERT(characters == 1);
> +#endif
> +
>   if (mode_ == ASCII) {
> -    __ ldrb(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    if (characters == 4) {
> +      __ ldr(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    } else if (characters == 2) {
> +      __ ldrh(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    } else {
> +      ASSERT(characters == 1);
> +      __ ldrb(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    }
>   } else {
>     ASSERT(mode_ == UC16);
> -    __ ldrh(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    if (characters == 2) {
> +      __ ldr(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    } else {
> +      ASSERT(characters == 1);
> +      __ ldrh(current_character(), MemOperand(end_of_input_address(),
> offset));
> +    }
>   }
>  }
>
> =======================================
> --- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/simulator-arm.cc    Wed Apr 28 00:15:34
> 2010
> +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/arm/simulator-arm.cc    Thu May  6 05:49:12
> 2010
> @@ -864,16 +864,25 @@
>   registers_[12] = 0x50Bad4U;
>  }
>
> -
> -// The ARM cannot do unaligned reads and writes.  On some ARM platforms an
> -// interrupt is caused.  On others it does a funky rotation thing.  For
> now we
> -// simply disallow unaligned reads, but at some point we may want to move
> to
> -// emulating the rotate behaviour.  Note that simulator runs have the
> runtime
> +// Some Operating Systems allow unaligned access on ARMv7 targets. We
> +// assume that unaligned accesses are not allowed unless the v8 build
> system
> +// defines the CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES macro to be non-zero.
> +// The following statements below describes the behavior of the ARM CPUs
> +// that don't support unaligned access.
> +// Some ARM platforms raise an interrupt on detecting unaligned access.
> +// On others it does a funky rotation thing.  For now we
> +// simply disallow unaligned reads.  Note that simulator runs have the
> runtime
>  // system running directly on the host system and only generated code is
>  // executed in the simulator.  Since the host is typically IA32 we will
> not
> -// get the correct ARM-like behaviour on unaligned accesses.
> +// get the correct ARM-like behaviour on unaligned accesses for those ARM
> +// targets that don't support unaligned loads and stores.
> +
>
>  int Simulator::ReadW(int32_t addr, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  intptr_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<intptr_t*>(addr);
> +  return *ptr;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 3) == 0) {
>     intptr_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<intptr_t*>(addr);
>     return *ptr;
> @@ -881,10 +890,16 @@
>   PrintF("Unaligned read at 0x%08x\n", addr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
>   return 0;
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
>  void Simulator::WriteW(int32_t addr, int value, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  intptr_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<intptr_t*>(addr);
> +  *ptr = value;
> +  return;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 3) == 0) {
>     intptr_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<intptr_t*>(addr);
>     *ptr = value;
> @@ -892,10 +907,15 @@
>   }
>   PrintF("Unaligned write at 0x%08x, pc=%p\n", addr, instr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
>  uint16_t Simulator::ReadHU(int32_t addr, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  uint16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<uint16_t*>(addr);
> +  return *ptr;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
>     uint16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<uint16_t*>(addr);
>     return *ptr;
> @@ -903,10 +923,15 @@
>   PrintF("Unaligned unsigned halfword read at 0x%08x, pc=%p\n", addr,
> instr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
>   return 0;
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
>  int16_t Simulator::ReadH(int32_t addr, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  int16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<int16_t*>(addr);
> +  return *ptr;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
>     int16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<int16_t*>(addr);
>     return *ptr;
> @@ -914,10 +939,16 @@
>   PrintF("Unaligned signed halfword read at 0x%08x\n", addr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
>   return 0;
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
>  void Simulator::WriteH(int32_t addr, uint16_t value, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  uint16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<uint16_t*>(addr);
> +  *ptr = value;
> +  return;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
>     uint16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<uint16_t*>(addr);
>     *ptr = value;
> @@ -925,10 +956,16 @@
>   }
>   PrintF("Unaligned unsigned halfword write at 0x%08x, pc=%p\n", addr,
> instr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
>  void Simulator::WriteH(int32_t addr, int16_t value, Instr* instr) {
> +#if V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED
> +  int16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<int16_t*>(addr);
> +  *ptr = value;
> +  return;
> +#else
>   if ((addr & 1) == 0) {
>     int16_t* ptr = reinterpret_cast<int16_t*>(addr);
>     *ptr = value;
> @@ -936,6 +973,7 @@
>   }
>   PrintF("Unaligned halfword write at 0x%08x, pc=%p\n", addr, instr);
>   UNIMPLEMENTED();
> +#endif
>  }
>
>
> =======================================
> --- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/globals.h       Mon Apr 26 03:59:14 2010
> +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/globals.h       Thu May  6 05:49:12 2010
> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@
>  #elif defined(__ARMEL__)
>  #define V8_HOST_ARCH_ARM 1
>  #define V8_HOST_ARCH_32_BIT 1
> +// Some CPU-OS combinations allow unaligned access on ARM. We assume
> +// that unaligned accesses are not allowed unless the build system
> +// defines the CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES macro to be non-zero.
> +#if CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES
> +#define V8_HOST_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED 1
> +#endif
>  #elif defined(_MIPS_ARCH_MIPS32R2)
>  #define V8_HOST_ARCH_MIPS 1
>  #define V8_HOST_ARCH_32_BIT 1
> @@ -73,6 +79,12 @@
>  #if defined(V8_TARGET_ARCH_X64) || defined(V8_TARGET_ARCH_IA32)
>  #define V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED 1
>  #elif V8_TARGET_ARCH_ARM
> +// Some CPU-OS combinations allow unaligned access on ARM. We assume
> +// that unaligned accesses are not allowed unless the build system
> +// defines the CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES macro to be non-zero.
> +#if CAN_USE_UNALIGNED_ACCESSES
> +#define V8_TARGET_CAN_READ_UNALIGNED 1
> +#endif
>  #elif V8_TARGET_ARCH_MIPS
>  #else
>  #error Target architecture is not supported by v8
>
> --
> v8-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>

-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to