Review fixes:
- Only a cast for printf
- Use static_cast instead of const_cast
- Add entry to AUTHORS


http://codereview.chromium.org/8825003/diff/3001/src/mksnapshot.cc
File src/mksnapshot.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8825003/diff/3001/src/mksnapshot.cc#newcode112
src/mksnapshot.cc:112: fprintf(fp, "%d", at(j));
On 2011/12/12 18:06:17, Vyacheslav Egorov wrote:
you can probably just add a cast from char to
unsigned char here. This will be a smaller yet more
correct change (as it conveys our intent directly

I agree that the patch will be shorter. I am not sure that it is more
correct. With the current patch, no cast is needed which I regard as
more correct than adding a cast. However, I am open for either solution.

http://codereview.chromium.org/8825003/diff/3001/test/cctest/test-regexp.cc
File test/cctest/test-regexp.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8825003/diff/3001/test/cctest/test-regexp.cc#newcode840
test/cctest/test-regexp.cc:840: const_cast<uc16>('\xa0')};
On 2011/12/12 18:06:17, Vyacheslav Egorov wrote:
Why do you need const_cast here? const_cast is for
changing constness not type.

True, a static_cast should be sufficient. (In the patch description I
actually claimed that I were using a static_cast.)

http://codereview.chromium.org/8825003/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to