I'll do that and report back, thanks On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:58, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Since we know of no bugs in the floating point number processing it > would be great if you could narrow down the problem and produce a test > case where the output differ. Without that, we have very little to go > on. > > Thanks, -- Mads > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM, skrat<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes exactly, Chromium is much faster but it produces faulty results. > > There is bug in that geometry code, as you can see in the FF image, > > but regardless of that, same code should produce same results across > > browsers (IE not a browser) > > > > On Aug 20, 12:28 pm, Kasper Lund <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, skrat<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Before posting any code, I would like to know if there are any known > >> > differences in floating point number processing, eventually Math.* > >> > functions. That would make it clear why are the drawings different. > >> > >> I'm not aware of any intentional differences. I take it you're less > >> happy with the drawings produced by Chromium than the Firefox > >> equivalents? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Kasper > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Dušan Maliarik // cell: +31681556139 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
