2009/8/20 Dušan Maliarik <[email protected]>: > I'll do that and report back, thanks
Perfect. Thanks a lot, Dušan! > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:58, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Since we know of no bugs in the floating point number processing it >> would be great if you could narrow down the problem and produce a test >> case where the output differ. Without that, we have very little to go >> on. >> >> Thanks, -- Mads >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM, skrat<[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Yes exactly, Chromium is much faster but it produces faulty results. >> > There is bug in that geometry code, as you can see in the FF image, >> > but regardless of that, same code should produce same results across >> > browsers (IE not a browser) >> > >> > On Aug 20, 12:28 pm, Kasper Lund <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, skrat<[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Before posting any code, I would like to know if there are any known >> >> > differences in floating point number processing, eventually Math.* >> >> > functions. That would make it clear why are the drawings different. >> >> >> >> I'm not aware of any intentional differences. I take it you're less >> >> happy with the drawings produced by Chromium than the Firefox >> >> equivalents? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kasper >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, Dušan Maliarik // cell: +31681556139 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
