*shortcut My last message was probably confusing, so continuing it - By that, I mean that it makes more sense for 'contains' to exists already on the web, than for 'includes'.
☆*PhistucK* On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:55 PM, PhistucK <phist...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is very debateable, really. To me, it makes sense (and in my > experience, also exists) that "contains" makes more sense (as a shortcuts > for return this.indexOf(str) !== -1) than 'includes'. > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phil...@opera.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Dmitry Lomov <dslo...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> > 'include' was previously named 'contains' and has been renamed at the >> last TC39 meeting. Firefox shipped 'contains' since release 17. >> >> It sure sounds like 'contains' would be less likely to cause trouble, >> and is also a slightly better name IMHO. >> >> Is Mozilla on board with renaming it? If they're not keen, I think >> following their lead with 'contains' makes more sense. >> >> Philip >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> > > -- -- v8-users mailing list v8-users@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
