When I ran the test in d8 (unfortunately I didn't keep the old binaries around so can't quickly verify) I saw at most a 10% difference between 7.1 vs 7.9.
Is this manifesting somewhere other than in your micro benchmark? Because this looks to be pretty much the worst case scenario, the function doesn't do anything except construct an Error object which requires constructing a stack trace and it needs to build 9 frames each time, but unless this is causing a problem in real code, I'm not sure how much attention it warrants. On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:42, Wilfried Gösgens <dotheb...@gmail.com> wrote: > This 600x slowdown was inside of arangosh due to pasting - its not there > anymore in the numbers of my previous post - sorry I didn't mention it > explicitely. > > However, if you compare the numbers of my previous post, there still is an > offset of ~40% which I'd still call significant? > > -- > -- > v8-users mailing list > v8-users@googlegroups.com > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "v8-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/cdeb797d-c2e3-4a8d-924f-cd484159e18f%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/cdeb797d-c2e3-4a8d-924f-cd484159e18f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- -- v8-users mailing list v8-users@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/CALH_77uxkpFEZrNVa01oYO1hEAd96-nu-Y05w6udnFOrh%3D3YUQ%40mail.gmail.com.
