On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:23 -0400, John Campbell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Ross Mohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:22 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > >> Personally, I'm happy that Ubuntu is doing all the legwork to round up > >> people > >> so I can conver^Windoctrin^Wstrong arm^W^Winform them about the One True > >> Way: > >> Gentoo. ;) > > > > Gentoo is The Way for distros. > > DWM is The Way for window managers (http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm). > > > "dwm has no multihead support." I believe that info is outdated. There are certainly folks using dwm in multihead, either with one instance spread across or multiple instances of dwm, each in its own montior.
> > dwm loses. > > Actually, about half of their feature list appears to be drawbacks > that they're trying to re-spin. I'll stick with fvwm2, thank you. dwm is geared towards people who want to be more productive and keep their ten fingers on the keyboard instead of endlessly going back and forth between kb and mouse. Are you more productive writing code in Vim/Emacs or in MS Word? Would you be more productive in dwm than fvwm2? -RPM
