Hi, Adding a module may not be as easy as it seems.
It is not infeasible to add a vala module compiling array and matrix operations into function calls. The issue is where we put the implementation of these functions. The dependency on an library other than GLib is definitely not intended by VALA. but if we put these calls as static functions in the c code files(as _vala_array_xxx), there will be plenty of replicas across the entire generated ccode project. Therefore I tend to retract my proposal on writing these vala compiler modules. It might be more feasible to do the follows: 1 Implement in C a runtime library implementing all array and matrix operations, with vapi files. 2 Patch VALA, allowing compiling arithmetic expressions to function calls. 3 Patch VALA, allow the mapping between functions and arithmetic operators in vapi bindings. 4 Modify the vapi files, map operator functions to operators, with the grammar suggested by a friend in the previous mails. The library also need to be standardized in a formal way so that people won't re-implement it again and again. Regards, Yu On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 09:34 -0700, Conrad Steenberg wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the response. > > I've used Python + numerical/numpy in various guises since 1996, and > it's great for many things, especially compared to the sluggishness of > Matlab. > > A lot of our code needs a little (OK a lot) more speed in the "glue" > parts that usually gets handled by Python, so I end up having to write > Python extensions in C or Pyrex to speed things up. I guess that you > could say that the "organizational" parts of the code is becoming the > bottleneck. > > So the get this back on-topic: having support for arrays/matrices with > easy to read operators would allow the use of only one language that is > both fast and productive, especially using the Genie syntax. > > Anybody wants to add array and matrix types to Vala as a Google Summer > of Code project? :-) > > Cheers, > Conrad > > > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:40 -0600, Michael Torrie wrote: > > Conrad Steenberg wrote: > > > FWIW I would really like to see this implemented as I write scientific > > > code every day and would love to use Vala/Genie instead of C++ :-) > > > > This is OT, but most of the scientists around here (at my university) > > have all switched away from Fortran and C++ to Python. They use fast > > numeric libraries like scipy, numpy, matlibplot, and other tools. In > > fact a few have replaced MatLab with Python with great success. Python > > may be more appropriate for your use than Vala, in this specific case, > > if you feel inclined. > > > > I personally see Vala as a tool to develop and enhance GTK and other > > Gnome-based libraries mainly. In fact I could see future versions of > > GTK being written mostly in Vala. I know that several folks on this > > list are using Vala as a main language, though. > > > > I wonder how easy it would be to write python extension modules using > > Vala. > > _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
