Didier "Ptitjes" <ptit...@...> writes: > > Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > > 2009/7/20 Didier "Ptitjes" <ptitjes <at> free.fr>: > >> - Are there some things missing ? > >> > > > > Could you fit in making Map interface a Collection? It is technically > > a collection of key-value pairs, and I see no reason why the interface > > shouldn't reflect it. :) > > Yeah. I agree on that, hence my question in the first mail about > exposing an interface for map entries (that key/value pairs).
How is that possible, the methods' signatures do not match: - Collection.add (G item) vs. Map.set (K key, V value) - Collection.contains (G item) vs. Map.contains (K key) - Collection.remove (K item) vs. Map.remove (K key) Collection implements Iterable which provides this method: Iterator<G> iterator () whereas it should be Iterator<Pair<K, V>> iterator () for Map. I'm looking forward to your answers. _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
