SWIG is not writing your own bindings and, in my experience, does not result in a very Pythonic API.
Unless SWIG has substantially matured, to the extent of being able to specify functions to support sequence, mapping, iteration, etc in the PyType definition, its an inadequate solution. On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:31 AM, pancake <[email protected]> wrote: > You can use valaswig. > > > On Jun 19, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Celil <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am writing Python bindings to a library that is written in Vala. >> Currently, I need to output the header files, and write the bindings in >> C. However, tt would be very nice if it was possible to write then in >> Vala. >> >> Is anybody writing a vala vapi for "Python.h"? It would be pretty sweet >> to be able to write python extensions in vala. >> >> Celil >> _______________________________________________ >> vala-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list >> >> _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list >
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
