What does it not support, then, out of the PyType slots: - tp_name - can the name be set manually, or must it mimic the Vala name - tp_print - tp_repr - this is extremely important for frameworks - tp_as_number - tp_as_sequence - tp_as_mapping - tp_hash - tp_call - tp_str - tp_getattro - tp_setattro - tp_as_buffer - tp_flags - tp_doc - essential - does this copy valadoc or have another method to set it - tp_clear - tp_richcompare - tp_weaklistoffset - tp_iter - tp_iternext - tp_methods - tp_members - tp_getset - tp_base - can it be subclassed - tp_dict - tp_descr_get - tp_descr_set - tp_dictoffset - tp_init - tp_alloc - tp_new - tp_free - tp_bases - tp_subclasses - tp_weaklist
Some of these are redundant or depreciated in use, but a vast majority of them are essential. Does it convert to bytes/unicode properly? Does it check the type being passed to ensure the resulting bindings cannot be segfaulted by pure Python code? Does it map libgee to these datatypes or what is the method used to pass container objects between GObject code and Python? Most importantly, where are the docs, or at least example code showing that/how these things work? On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:41 AM, pancake <[email protected]> wrote: > Valaswig does the wrap for all this stuff. Well not all, but most of it. > > > On Jun 19, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Arc Riley <[email protected]> wrote: > > SWIG is not writing your own bindings and, in my experience, does not > result in a very Pythonic API. > > Unless SWIG has substantially matured, to the extent of being able to > specify functions to support sequence, mapping, iteration, etc in the PyType > definition, its an inadequate solution. > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:31 AM, pancake < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> You can use valaswig. >> >> >> On Jun 19, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Celil < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am writing Python bindings to a library that is written in Vala. >>> Currently, I need to output the header files, and write the bindings in >>> C. However, tt would be very nice if it was possible to write then in >>> Vala. >>> >>> Is anybody writing a vala vapi for "Python.h"? It would be pretty sweet >>> to be able to write python extensions in vala. >>> >>> Celil >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vala-list mailing list >>> <[email protected]>[email protected] >>> <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list> >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> vala-list mailing list >> <[email protected]>[email protected] >> <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
