2012/2/19 Tal Hadad <tal...@hotmail.com>: > > I don't understand what is your purpose: > I don't understand why you don't use constructors, or static methods.
I'd got myself in a bit of a mess inheriting singleton factory classes and static properties/methods....coming from a C background, I get a bit over-exciteable around OO. I've since refactored with templates and accepted the 'singletons are evil' lore, which has made everything a lot simpler. > See, the type deceleration must be explicit at complication time. > However, if you don't want it, you can always use generics and the "dynamic" > word. Meh, I very much like the concept of 'complication time'. What is this 'dynamic' keyword of which you speak? cheers ant _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
