It's not for you at all(and won't solve anything), but take a look at this
example:
https://live.gnome.org/Vala/GStreamerSample
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:24:31 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Vala] Create an instance of a derived class, from a base class
> method
> From: blowb...@gmail.com
> To: tal...@hotmail.com
> CC: vala-list@gnome.org
>
> 2012/2/19 Tal Hadad <tal...@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > I don't understand what is your purpose:
> > I don't understand why you don't use constructors, or static methods.
>
> I'd got myself in a bit of a mess inheriting singleton factory classes
> and static properties/methods....coming from a C background, I get a
> bit over-exciteable around OO. I've since refactored with templates
> and accepted the 'singletons are evil' lore, which has made everything
> a lot simpler.
>
> > See, the type deceleration must be explicit at complication time.
> > However, if you don't want it, you can always use generics and the
> > "dynamic" word.
>
> Meh, I very much like the concept of 'complication time'. What is this
> 'dynamic' keyword of which you speak?
>
> cheers
> ant
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
