> I imagine that there are implemented, but hidden behind Vala's locking > syntax. See https://live.gnome.org/Vala/Tutorial#Resource_Control They're not. I've read this page. Locking uses G_LOCK_DEFINE, G_LOCK and G_UNLOCK, which are completely different.
> Bug reports belong on the bug tracker. They are easily forgotten when > posted here. I did: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685139 Thanks! Tal Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:33:46 +0100 From: t...@jollybox.de To: vala-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Vala] GLib binding missing: GLib.Once and bit locking are missing On 09/26/2012 09:44 PM, Tal Hadad wrote: > After looking on this page: > http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.31/glib-Threads.html > I see that those useful thread-safe binding are missing: > * GLib.Once namespace and its methods. > * g_bit_lock, g_bit_try_lock and g_bit_unlock in GLib.AtomicInt > * g_pointer_lock, g_pointer_try_lock and g_pointer_unlock in > GLib.AtomicPointer I imagine that there are implemented, but hidden behind Vala's locking syntax. See https://live.gnome.org/Vala/Tutorial#Resource_Control > > Please fix them on the next release. Bug reports belong on the bug tracker. They are easily forgotten when posted here. > > Yours > Tal > > > > _______________________________________________ > vala-list mailing list > vala-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
