I have been doing some bindings for Vala and noticed something inconsistent in the naming of enums.
// VALID enum Foo { 1FOO } // INVALID enum Bar { 33 } The thing is that you can name an enum like Foo.1FOO, but not Bar.33, if the reason to support enums prefixed with a number is because the C translation doesnt breaks anything.. why do using numeric values breaks? Is this defined by the Vala language or it’s just a bug? _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list