On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:19 +0100, pancake wrote:
> I have been doing some bindings for Vala and noticed something inconsistent
> in the naming of enums.
>
> // VALID
> enum Foo {
> 1FOO
> }
>
> // INVALID
> enum Bar {
> 33
> }
>
> The thing is that you can name an enum like Foo.1FOO, but not Bar.33,
> if the reason to support enums prefixed with a number is because the C
> translation doesnt breaks anything.. why do using numeric values
> breaks?
>
> Is this defined by the Vala language or it’s just a bug?
Refusing to accept 33 is not a bug. Accepting 1FOO might be.
You can use
public enum Bar {
@33
}
-Evan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
