On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:19 +0100, pancake wrote: > I have been doing some bindings for Vala and noticed something inconsistent > in the naming of enums. > > // VALID > enum Foo { > 1FOO > } > > // INVALID > enum Bar { > 33 > } > > The thing is that you can name an enum like Foo.1FOO, but not Bar.33, > if the reason to support enums prefixed with a number is because the C > translation doesnt breaks anything.. why do using numeric values > breaks? > > Is this defined by the Vala language or it’s just a bug?
Refusing to accept 33 is not a bug. Accepting 1FOO might be. You can use public enum Bar { @33 } -Evan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list