On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:03:27 GMT, Benoît Maillard <[email protected]> wrote:

> This PR prevents creating a missed optimization opportunity that originates 
> from creating inconsistent `TypeArrayPtr` types.
> 
> ## Context
> 
> The link between the root cause of this issue and how it gets reported as a 
> missing optimization opportunity is quite subtle.
> 
> We initially have a chain of two `CheckCastPP` nodes, where the first one is 
> a cast to `not null free` and the second one is a cast to `flat`:
> 
>   ...
> CheckCastPP
>    |
> CheckCastPP
>   ...
> 
> 
> Let's look at what happens in `ConstraintCastNode::Value`: 
> 
> In the initial GVN pass of `ConstraintCastNode::Value` for the **second 
> node**, we have (only looking at `not_null_free`):
> 
> - `in_type`
>   - `not_null_free` is `true`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative) is `false`
> - `_type`
>   - `not_null_free` is `false`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative, implicitly) is `false`
> - `ft` (join of `in_type` and `_type`)
>   - `not_null_free` is `true`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative) is `false`
> 
> Note that here the speculative part of `ft` is eventually dropped because in 
> `cleanup_speculative` we keep the speculative part only if it contains 
> information about flat-/nullability:
> ```c++
> const Type* TypeAryPtr::cleanup_speculative() const {
>   if (speculative() == nullptr) {
>     return this;
>   }
>   // Keep speculative part if it contains information about flat-/nullability
>   const TypeAryPtr* spec_aryptr = speculative()->isa_aryptr();
>   if (spec_aryptr != nullptr && !above_centerline(spec_aryptr->ptr()) &&
>       (spec_aryptr->is_not_flat() || spec_aryptr->is_not_null_free())) {
>     return this;
>   }
>   return TypeOopPtr::cleanup_speculative();
> }
> 
> 
> In the IGVN verification, we have a second pass of 
> `ConstraintCastNode::Value`:
> - `in_type` (same as first pass)
>   - `not_null_free` is `true`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative) is `false`
> - `_type` (changed)
>   - `not_null_free` is `true`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative, implicitly) is `true`
> - `ft` (join of `in_type` and `_type`)
>   - `not_null_free` is `true`
>   - `not_null_free` (speculative) is `true`
> 
> This time the speculative type is kept, however, because it contains 
> information about not-nullability.
> 
> Now the second pass happens in IGVN verification, and we hit the missed 
> optimization opportunity assert because we are not expected to make progress 
> again (the input has not changed in the meantime).
> 
> ## Root cause
> 
> Now we could arguably clean up the resulting speculative type as well as it 
> is redundant. But this would obfuscate the fact the initial type of the first 
> `CheckCastPP` is alread...

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: dc15f9b0
Author:    Benoît Maillard <[email protected]>
Committer: Tobias Hartmann <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/commit/dc15f9b079e468b1d6c12cb3754a11c2db59323b
Stats:     112 lines in 4 files changed: 93 ins; 4 del; 15 mod

8367624: [lworld] C2: Missed Value() optimization for CheckCastPP

Reviewed-by: thartmann

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2242

Reply via email to