valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8388419: [lworld] cherry-pick JDK-8388347 Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Daniel D . Daugherty
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • [lworld] Withdrawn: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
• [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation [v3] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8388380: [lworld] Improve the documentation of jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation Jaikiran Pai
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8388372: [lworld] ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache/AOTMapTest.java#valhalla in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Withdrawn: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388343: [lworld] Reevaluate the enable-preview in memory compilation from VM arguments Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] Compiled code failing with verifier error Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] Compiled code failing with verifier error Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8388261: [lworld] javac creates early_larval_frame and ACC_STRICT_INIT in record non-preview class files Chen Liang
• New candidate JEP: 401: Value Objects (Preview) Mark Reinhold
• [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc Jean-Noël Rouvignac
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] Add summary of JDI support for value objects in ObjectReference javadoc [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification [v4] Alan Bateman
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8388113: [lworld] JDI and JDWP spec update: ObjectReference summary, Value class clarification, strict field initialization clarification Chris Plummer
• [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 David Simms
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 David Simms
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v2] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v4] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v4] Lois Foltan
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 [v5] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386451: [lworld] things to delete from lworld just before integrating JEP-401 Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v6] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v7] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file [v8] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387875: [lworld] Provide value-class-preview.md file Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8388068: [lworld] PhantomReference constructor should use linkplain instead of link in its throws clause javadoc Jaikiran Pai
• [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add general spec clarification about value objects [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387997: [lworld] Add JVMTI general spec clarification about value objects Serguei Spitsyn
• [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors [v3] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8387800: [lworld] PPC64 field flattening bugs in JEP 401 Martin Doerr
  • [lworld] Withdrawn: 8387800: [lworld] PPC64 field flattening bugs in JEP 401 Martin Doerr
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387800: [lworld] PPC64 field flattening bugs in JEP 401 Martin Doerr
• [lworld] RFR: 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false Marc Chevalier
• [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup Alan Bateman
• [lworld] RFR: 8386861: [lworld] emit_opSubstitutabilityCheck speedup Daisuke Yamazaki

• Earlier messages
• Later messages