On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 23:36:05 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
> `ValueBased` talks about constructor avoidance but does not specify the > reason. It's better to include the reason because it's not straightforward > from the fact that there's no binary incompatibility. > > Also `InvalidClassException` benefits from descriptions about > strictly-initialized fields. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/doc-files/ValueBased.html line 39: > 37: A value-based class has the following properties: > 38: <ul> > 39: <li>all instance fields declared in the class and all its > superclasses are Suggestion: <li>all instance fields declared in the class and all of its superclasses are ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2631#discussion_r3596140792
