On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Federico Schwindt <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't have an opinion either. > That said, this variable is also set for passes. In that case people > checking this variable will find it set but there won't be any logging.
Isn't it bereq.uncacheable that is set for passes? > Not sure if that's an issue but I'd argue is not consistent. Maybe I should use a better name instead? This is logged when VCL sets this variable, not varnishd itself. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
