> Still doesn't say a thing to me. The pass happens in recv (client side) not > in bereq (backend side). > Explaining obscure things in the doc is not the right way to go. If anything > it should complement an already well explained situation.
I meant improving the docs in my patch, like for example the long description of the VSL record (enumerating the reasons and their meaning). > I'd rather move it where it belongs, that is where do_pass is set to 1. But do_pass is bereq.uncacheable, and until you actually get a response from the backend I don't think it would make sense to log that beresp.uncacheable has been set. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
