In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?UTF-8?B?S2VubmV0aCBSw7hydmlr?= writes: >Denis Brækhus wrote: >> So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release to be? > >I cannot comment on the code itself, but I can give a couple of comments >on how I perceive varnish as an end-user:
I have always myself been cautions about software with an odd numbered release, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 etc. I have too much statistical evidence to call this a superstition :-) I've seen "productionquality" software fare worse than Varnish and I have seen much software with better error handling than varnish presently have, but all in all, Varnish is an average 1.0 release. The good news is that Varnish doesn't suffer from anything that cannot, and will not, get fixed, given time & money to do so. I've spent my "Varnish-time" this month plotting the way ahead and hopefully Per Buer from Linpro will soon tell me that we have the necessary sponsors for version 2 lined up, allowing us to really move forward. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc