Denis Brækhus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are > > currently very small (a few bug fixes). > So SVN would actually be more stable then?
Possibly, if your environment triggers the bugs that have been fixed since the last release. > > Whether Varnish is usable in a production environment depends on the > > nature of your application. Varnish currently does not respect Vary: > > headers and interacts poorly with cookies, but if you don't use > > either, you'll be fine. > Is it possible to define "interacts poorly with cookies"? I do think > our application relies quite heavily on cookies for session > handling. Does interacting poorly imply that any site where cookies > are used do not work well with Varnish, or simply that Varnish does > not handle caching well when cookies are involved? Basically, if a page uses cookies, you can't cache it. That goes for any proxy, not just Varnish. By default, Varnish goes into PASS mode if the client includes a cookie in the request. It will however cache a page delivered from the backend even if it contains a cookie, so everybody gets the same cookie until the page expires... In Varnish 1.0, this is a feature, as it was not intended for sites that use cookies. I expect that in Varnish 2.0 - perhaps even in 1.1 if we decide to do a 1.1 - it will be reclassified as a bug, and fixed. Workaround: if only part of your site uses cookies, you can configure Varnish to always use PASS mode for that part, and cache the rest. BTW, I've looked at startsiden.no and did not find any cookies on any page I visited. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
