In message <[email protected]>, Bedi s 9 writes:
>I just wonder why the second request is a MISS while the gzipped >object is already in memory. It souldn't have been. The normal cause is cookies, by default varnish does not cache anything that comes with cookies, since we don't know what they mean. >Can't Varnish use it to deliver a gunzipped object? Yes, that's the entire point. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
