On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, > Bedi > s 9 writes: > >>I just wonder why the second request is a MISS while the gzipped >>object is already in memory. > > It souldn't have been. > > The normal cause is cookies, by default varnish does not cache > anything that comes with cookies, since we don't know what they > mean. > >>Can't Varnish use it to deliver a gunzipped object? > > Yes, that's the entire point. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
I did not use any cookie, only basic wget request with minimal client headers. Do you want me to create a ticket for that? _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
