I'm posting this here to ask if others have had similar experiences and
if it'd make sense to try to take to the developer list in some way.   a
short time ago, I upgraded my vbox installation on my home machine, I
shutdown all my VMs, ran the upgrade, rebooted the server host OS,
forgot about the extension pack for the new version of virtualbox,
several VMs were started by my init scripts, many failed due to settings
requiring the extension pack.   I installed the pack then began using
the virtualbox gui interface to reset/reboot and verify the new
machines.   2 in particular were very troublesome; they appeared to be
down in the gui interface, attempts to start them would give machines
with bad root partitions, fsck, restart, repeat.

after much frustration and more cooldown time, I discovered there were
multiple instances of the VM running (specifically after shutting down
the gui console instance, the gui showed the VM as down, ps auxww |
egrep -i $vm_name gave processes).    after killing the processes, I was
able to start the VM and connect to it in my normal, expected ways.

my question is: should there be more/better VM state locking to prevent
this sort of thing from being able to happen?

-- 
public gpg key id: AE60F64C



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
VBox-users-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:  
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to