Frank, Yes. That is correct.
If I were to build a new and "latest" rawhide system I'd download from this directory: Index of /pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/iso Once this system is installed and booted, I would run "dnf upgrade"... probably daily. Any bugs I find would be reported at bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi after logging in of course. George... On Monday, August 19, 2019, 10:37:04 PM PDT, Frank Batschulat <[email protected]> wrote: George, I assume by "Fedora Core rawhide" you mean this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/repositories/ the current development version of Fedora? On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:16:52 +0200, George R Goffe <[email protected]> wrote: > Frank, > > Thank you for responding to me about this problem. > > Fedora Core seems to have just transitioned from FC (rawhide)(fc31) to > FC (rawhide)(fc32). This problem exists with both FC31 and FC32... BOTH > are rawhide and BOTH come from the Fedora rawhide repositories. > > My current kernel is: > > uname -a > Linux fc31 5.3.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 14 15:05:26 UTC > 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > On Monday, August 19, 2019, 5:20:13 AM PDT, Frank Batschulat > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:14:37 +0200, George R Goffe via > VBox-users-community <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've seen this problem for the past few weeks but have been waiting to >> see if it gets fixed. Sadly, it has not. >> >> I have tried to fix the problem and got these messages resolved but >> further into the build another failure appears. Obviously the kernel has >> changed... NOT so obvious is what the change is attempting to accomplish >> or what VB needs to do to resolve the problem. >> >> Has anyone seen and/or resolved this situation? > > I've not seen Fedora 31/32. I just recently doenloaded Fedora 30 from > the offical website. It has kernel version 5.2.7 and GCC 9.1.1 > at the moment. > > Which kernel and GCC version does your 31/32 have and from where did you > got it? > > >> >> >> ./tools/objtool/objtool orc generate --module --no-fp --retpoline >> --uaccess /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o >> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c: In function >> ‘VBoxHost_RTMpOnAll’: >> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c:287:18: error: void value not >> ignored as it ought to be >> 287 | int rc = smp_call_function(rtmpLinuxAllWrapper, &Args, 0/* >> wait */); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c: In function >> ‘VBoxHost_RTMpOnOthers’: >> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c:341:8: error: void value not >> ignored as it ought to be >> 341 | rc = smp_call_function(rtmpLinuxWrapper, &Args, 1 /* wait */); >> | ^ >> >> >> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c: In function >> ‘vboxNetFltLinuxEnumeratorCallback’: >> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c:2126:9: error: implicit declaration >> of function ‘for_ifa’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 2126 | for_ifa(in_dev) { >> | ^~~~~~~ >> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c:2126:24: error: expected ‘;’ before >> ‘{’ token >> 2126 | for_ifa(in_dev) { > >> | ^~ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VBox-users-community mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community >> _______________________________________________ >> Unsubscribe: >> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > > -- frankB Oracle Virtualbox Development _______________________________________________ VBox-users-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
