Frank,
I haven't heard anything about this subject... Is anything interesting
happening?
Regards,
George...
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 10:06:31 AM PDT, George R Goffe
<[email protected]> wrote:
Frank,
Thanks for your attention to this problem.
If you need more info or would like me to test something, just ask.
Best regards,
George...
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 12:16:52 AM PDT, Frank Batschulat
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:05:04 +0200, George R Goffe <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Yes. That is correct.
>
> If I were to build a new and "latest" rawhide system I'd download from
> this directory:
>
> Index of /pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/iso
>
> Once this system is installed and booted, I would run "dnf upgrade"...
> probably daily. Any bugs I find would be reported at
> bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi after logging in of course.
thanks, I've taken this one from the QA farm:
https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190819.n.4/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20190819.n.4.iso
to build a system running this latest mainline kernel
plus Fedora environment.
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019, 10:37:04 PM PDT, Frank Batschulat
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> George,
>
> I assume by "Fedora Core rawhide" you mean this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/repositories/
>
> the current development version of Fedora?
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:16:52 +0200, George R Goffe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Frank,
>>
>> Thank you for responding to me about this problem.
>>
>> Fedora Core seems to have just transitioned from FC (rawhide)(fc31) to
>> FC (rawhide)(fc32). This problem exists with both FC31 and FC32... BOTH
>> are rawhide and BOTH come from the Fedora rawhide repositories.
>>
>> My current kernel is:
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux fc31 5.3.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 14 15:05:26 UTC
>> 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> On Monday, August 19, 2019, 5:20:13 AM PDT, Frank Batschulat
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:14:37 +0200, George R Goffe via
>> VBox-users-community <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen this problem for the past few weeks but have been waiting to
>>> see if it gets fixed. Sadly, it has not.
>>>
>>> I have tried to fix the problem and got these messages resolved but
>>> further into the build another failure appears. Obviously the kernel
>>> has
>>> changed... NOT so obvious is what the change is attempting to
>>> accomplish
>>> or what VB needs to do to resolve the problem.
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen and/or resolved this situation?
>>
>> I've not seen Fedora 31/32. I just recently doenloaded Fedora 30 from
>> the offical website. It has kernel version 5.2.7 and GCC 9.1.1
>> at the moment.
>>
>> Which kernel and GCC version does your 31/32 have and from where did you
>> got it?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ./tools/objtool/objtool orc generate --module --no-fp --retpoline
>>> --uaccess /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/initterm-r0drv-linux.o
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c: In function
>>> ‘VBoxHost_RTMpOnAll’:
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c:287:18: error: void value not
>>> ignored as it ought to be
>>> 287 | int rc = smp_call_function(rtmpLinuxAllWrapper, &Args, 0/*
>>> wait */);
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c: In function
>>> ‘VBoxHost_RTMpOnOthers’:
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/r0drv/linux/mp-r0drv-linux.c:341:8: error: void value not
>>> ignored as it ought to be
>>> 341 | rc = smp_call_function(rtmpLinuxWrapper, &Args, 1 /* wait */);
>>> | ^
>>>
>>>
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c: In function
>>> ‘vboxNetFltLinuxEnumeratorCallback’:
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c:2126:9: error: implicit
>>> declaration
>>> of function ‘for_ifa’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> 2126 | for_ifa(in_dev) {
>>> | ^~~~~~~
>>> /tmp/vbox.0/linux/VBoxNetFlt-linux.c:2126:24: error: expected ‘;’
>>> before
>>> ‘{’ token
>>> 2126 | for_ifa(in_dev) {
>>
>>> | ^~
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VBox-users-community mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>>
>
>
--
frankB
Oracle Virtualbox Development
_______________________________________________
VBox-users-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
