John Simpson wrote: > On 2006-04-15, at 1917, Rick Widmer wrote: >> Robin Bowes wrote: >>> What is the problem you are trying to solve? >> >> No real problem, just something I consider wasteful of resources. For >> example, if all you are doing is rebuilding a validrcptto database >> currently you are doing it three times every time you add a domain. >> Two of them are instantly thrown away as soon as they finish. > > actually, i'm not- but you do have a point. whoever writes an "onchange" > script does need to worry about this issue- but i don't think it's right > to give up the flexibility in order to not have to write proper > "onchange" scripts.
I agree with John. >>> Why is this not add_valias, del_valias? (to make it the same as the >>> user/domain hooks) ? >> >> I don't know. John? > > the idea was that the names were are all the same as vpopmaild commands. > however, these functions don't exist in vpopmaild, so i used the names > of the actual functions within the vpopmail source code. > > would it be better to use the vpopmail function names for all of the > notifications, so that they are all consistent? if so, now is the time > to make the decision, since nobody (as far as i know) has written any > onchange scripts which would look for specific strings. I don't relaly care, as long as they're consistent, i.e. either add_user or user_add. R.
