On Thu, Oct 02 2008, George Danchev wrote: > Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > --cut-- >> Well, You look at the public branches to see the divergence. and >> if you think my repo does not match the sources (which is a trust >> issue, I suppose), You'll have ot do whatever you need to, since >> obviously you do not believe my tagging. > > Multiply that with the number of your possible users, and you will see > what a giant time-waste is.
I do not see a major use case for distrusting the developer as the basis of collaboration. >> Frankly, none of the things you are saying make a compelling >> argument for quilt. madduck makes a better case. > > Nobody is comparing git with quilt, really. Obviously you are trying > to compare different unit types as a result of muddle thinking. It is > not git *or* quilt, but DVCS *and* some sort of patch series and I see > LKML and git developers constantly performing that. So, forget about > quilt and think of the least common multiple as an abstract change > units every can inherit and extend. Fine. Then I posit that the best way to help people is to give them the same environment that I work with (preferred form of modification and all). This means putting in ./debian/topic a patchset for each pure featrue branch, that is not serialized, so people can try out each fauture by itself, makes it easier for upstream or downstream to get a single feature cherry picked. The diff.gz is then the integration branch, and produces the sources that the package was built from. The one thing you lose is the serialization changes (the efort that is spent in serializing the features). Given the advantages (ability to checkout any feature independently, exact replication of the developers working environment), I am willing to fail on the linkage between feature branches and the integration branch being re-done on the fly during build. manoj -- After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C _______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss