Martin Sivák has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: vdsm: Reboot capability for VM
......................................................................


Patch Set 23:

Dan: IIRC the checkSuccess approach was just a convenient way of doing this 
without having to pass the callback result between threads. And the check was 
the same for the whole chain so we avoided a slight code duplication as well.

But if we are splitting the patch into a general utility CallbackChain class 
and VmPowerDown that uses it, then having separate and possibly different check 
for each step also makes sense.

My comments were actually meant as a summary (that is why I gave no score) of 
all the complaints I heard compiled into a reasonable form. I would personally 
still prefer much more declarative approach.

Martin will be back at noon so he will probably add comments later.

Btw, how do you unittest threading class? Integration/functional tests are 
quite possible, but mocking thread behaviour to achieve unittest isolation? I 
would love to see a unittest for thread class, but I have not found any 
satisfactory way of doing it so far.

-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/15829
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I12737e363a80679ffb1db55f14eaee158312d7da
Gerrit-PatchSet: 23
Gerrit-Project: vdsm
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Martin Betak <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Antoni Segura Puimedon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Federico Simoncelli <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Giuseppe Vallarelli <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Betak <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Sivák <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michal Skrivanek <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Omer Frenkel <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter V. Saveliev <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vinzenz Feenstra <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: No
_______________________________________________
vdsm-patches mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-patches

Reply via email to